Erasing the traces of the scam: crypto fraudster Aleksander Orlovskiy cleans search results of facts about the fake rating and inconsistencies in his biography

Erasing the traces of the scam: crypto fraudster Aleksander Orlovskiy cleans search results of facts about the fake rating and inconsistencies in his biography

Aleksander Orlovskiy and his Financial Freedom Academy are actively cleaning up the internet of publications that raise questions about his business, public biography, and the awards he has received. Old materials are disappearing, links stop working, and in their place, search results retain a polished image of a successful crypto entrepreneur.

But removing publications does not erase facts that have already been made public. That is why we are republishing this material — to remind readers how Orlovskiy built his reputation, how he obtained his “victory” in the rating, and why this story deserves attention.

Entrepreneur Aleksander Orlovskiy, who presents himself as the founder of Financial Freedom Academy (FFA), bought himself a commissioned rating.

This was revealed by the media through an analysis of the rating website.

It is reported that Orlovskiy promotes himself. The 26-year-old man, who was not called up to serve in the Armed Forces of Ukraine, claims that he founded “the largest crypto community in Ukraine, with more than 17,000 members.”

Новости по теме: В Закарпатской области ливни подтопили несколько населенных пунктов

It is claimed that Aleksander Orlovskiy has lived in Poland since his school years, reportedly since 2014. However, his colleagues point out that he obtained his foreign passport only on February 11, 2015. A quick search reveals numerous reports stating that Orlovskiy received an award from the 2024 “Choice of the Country” ranking of the best products and services in the category “Crypto Education of the Year.” However, there is one problem: the organization’s official website lists six companies and projects in this ranking category, but Orlovskiy’s FFA is nowhere to be found. This suggests that the man paid to receive a neatly designed certificate from organizers who did not even verify his activities. This casts doubt on the credibility of their rankings, which have been conducted since 2017.